Home
Alcoholism Questions
Cocaine Addiction Questions
Drug Testing Questions
Addiction Questions
Addiction Intervention Questions
Addiction Rehab Questions
Site Map
 
 
   
Are there any standards as to what this treatment should consist of, and when it should be considered unnecessary?


Question:
I have some questions related to alcoholism diagnosis and treatment: Do psychologists see alcohol abuse as a specific behavior that can be discontinued, or as symptomatic of psychological problems which must be found and treated before change can be effected? If an individual discontinues abusive drinking behavior, does a previous diagnosis of Alcohol Dependency and/or Alcohol Abuse still apply? (If so, for how long?) Assuming no medical problems (no detox necessary), what is meant by (outpatient) "alcoholism treatment"? Are there any standards as to what this treatment should consist of, and when it should be considered unnecessary? Do assessments/predictions such as "Relapse Potential Scale" have any scientific validity? I ask because treatment programs are neither designed nor staffed by professional psychologists or persons with scientific training, and the programs seem to be immune to scrutiny or evaluation of efficacy. It seems to me there is an opportunity for rampant fraud here, particularly since the "disease model" of problem drinking requires insurance to pay for anything called "alcoholism treatment."


Answer:
Alcoholism is a primary illness, which is to say that it is not a symptom of some other problem. However, an alcoholic may have other psychological problems which can complicate and be complicated by alcoholism. Depression, for example, or antisocial personality disorder, or an anxiety disorder, etc. I know quite a few schizophrenics who are also alcoholic. After years of drinking abusively, many alcoholics begin to develop cognitive impairments (dementia) which can be irreversible, just as liver damage, stomach damage, etc. associated with alcoholism can be irreversible even if the person stops drinking. Yes. The diagnosis changes to "alcohol dependence, in remission." There are everal identified subtypes of remission: early full remission, early partial remission, sustained full remission, sustained partial remission, etc. It should also be noted that the diagnosis differentiates between alcoholics with and without physiological dependence; the difference is whether the individual exhibits alcohol withdrawal syndrome after ceasing to drink. This usually develops within 24-72 hours.

Alcohol treatment comes in a broad spectrum, including self-help (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous), inpatient treatment (usually 21 or 28 days), outpatient treatment, etc. In Minnesota it's a growth industry (just kidding- as HMOs come more to the fore in health care, the rates of people being treated with inpatient hospitalization is being reduced significantly).

Are there standards for treatment programs? Yes and no. Programs that receive Medicare or Medicaid dollars must meet specific criteria for continued funding. These criteria have force of law and providers that fail to meet those criteria and continue to bill for services can be charged with fraud. Programs reimbursed by insurance companies and HMOs generally are required to meet the criteria established by those payors. Most hositals also are accredited through an industry organization called the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Hospitals (or something like that). Medicare-eligible hospitals also undergo some kind of inspection process periodically. Typically the state Department of Health also has some sort of oversight procedure to monitor the quality of care in hospitals. Interestingly enough, hospitals work under far less scrutiny and far fewer regulations than do nursing homes.

The determination of "medical necessity" for treatment is negotiated between the person doing the assessment and the payor. In most cases, outpatient alcoholism treatment is associated with similar success and relapse risk rates as inpatient treatment programs. Outpatient programs are generally less expensive and are often considered less restrictive than inpatient programs. Scientific validity is a different question. There is scientific examination of such programs in terms of outcome studies, the results of which tend to be quite consistent. Basically, about 50% of participants have remained abstinent from alcohol after 1 year, IIRC. Some of the "old guard" in the CD field have strongly resisted scientific evaluation, since the AA Steps and Traditions remain the nucleus of the vast majority of treatment programs. One of those traditions is that AA is a non-professional self-help group which is not to be run by doctors, psychologists or other professional helpers.


What is Your answer?


 
Privacy Policy