Home
Alcoholism Questions
Cocaine Addiction Questions
Drug Testing Questions
Addiction Questions
Addiction Intervention Questions
Addiction Rehab Questions
Site Map
 
 
   
I'm not freaking out (yet) but should I be? Is this serious?


Question:
know there was a thread about this recently but my news server is only letting me see new threads so I can't access it - sorry.

I've just been told that I have GD, I'm 28 wks.

I'm not freaking out (yet) but should I be? Is this serious?

I've made an appointment to see the nurse and discuss diet and learn how to test blood sugar. I'm not a fan of unnecessary medical intervention so if there's an alternative treatment that somoen knows about please enlighten me.


Answer:
If you don't like unnecessary medical intervention, my advice would have been to refuse testing ;-)

Basically, there's a lot of controversy over GD. Just about every major medical group admits that there is no high quality medical evidence that screening improves outcomes. The two things that tend to be associated with GD are macrosomic babies (big babies, where "big" is most often defined as over 8 lbs 13 oz, even though most women with GD will not have macrosomic babies and most macrosomic babies are born to women without GD) and neonatal hypoglycemia (though at least one study suggests that NH is more strongly associated with blood glucose levels during labor than during pregnancy). Beyond that, there's the question of whether treatment for GD improves outcomes. There is precious little evidence that it does. Diet and/or insulin sometimes make the babies a little smaller, but they don't reduce the complications typically associated with macrosomia (e.g., shoulder dystocia, c-section). So, if treatment doesn't improve outcomes, why do it? The one thing that *is* consistently reported by research is that if you are diagnosed with GD, you are at higher risk for developing type 2 diabetes later in life. This should therefore be a wakeup call to get control of lifestyle factors that increase the risk of type 2 diabetes. The other thing to consider is whether there's a possibility that rather than having GD, you're an undiagnosed true diabetic. If you are, there are greater risks to the pregnancy, though 28 weeks is later than ideal to be finding out about that. As far as the diet goes, there's not much wrong with the usual diets recommended for GD as long as they are not calorie restrictive (some are, so watch out for that!). The downside, however, is that despite the fact that there's no evidence to support them, now that your caregivers know that you have GD, they may start pushing unwarranted interventions that in themselves increase risks (like pushing for induction for suspected large baby). Personally, given the lack of evidence showing that screening or treament improve outcomes significantly, I refuse to be tested (though I encourage women to be screened while *not* pregnant if they have any risk factors for diabetes so that they know if they're diabetic and can get good glycemic control in the FIRST trimester if they become pregnant).


What is Your answer?


 
Privacy Policy